In this country we have been born and raised in, we understand that we need to wear clothing, it is how we’ve evolved, and we know that we are not allowed to walk into stores or on sidewalks bluntly nude. According to the internet there are over 100,000 clothing stores and diverse styles to choose from. The largest companies are TJX Companies, Gap, Ross and Abercrombie and Fitch. The 50 largest companies soak up sixty-five percent of the clothing strength. Competition for clothing stores include department stores, discount stores, online stores and catalog vendors. Our options are limited at intervals by society, where we are at in this world and how much money we have in our wallets. Who would have thought that race determined the type of clothes you wear? Why does it matter? What insights can the three theoretical approaches explain to us about our clothing industries and how they flow in our ever-changing society?
A Structural-functional approach, based on the text “is a system of interrelated parts that is relatively stable,” each part works to keep society working in an orderly manner. At the macro level, clothing as a manifest is a drastically popular topic. You can without a doubt over-hear a conversation of someone asking, where they got a certain pair of jeans at or basic top. We simply have to have clothes, no arguing about it. Ninety-five percent of stores at shopping malls are made up of clothing floor plans. These particular clothing stores don’t always follow many religions, you won’t find just anyone in stores at the mall but you get a mass variety of people. Some of the clothes advertised in the windows at the entries of stores will draw your eye in and you might also catch a glimpse of a price tag and keep on walking. Clothing creates a social solidarity among people; it also forms groups and stereotypes.
Not all humans are respectful and sometimes notice themselves gawking or criticizing what people are wearing on a daily basis. Sometimes it’s not always intended that way but most know when the right time and the wrong time is to wear a certain outfit. Age plays a big part in our society when it comes to clothing. The older a person is you’ll realize the higher their pants sit on their hips and the more supportive their shoes may seem rather than stylish. Previously down the age timeline you’ll find younger people wearing clothing that is maybe more stylish, that rest below the waist line, and shoes that may be uncomfortable but they look mainstream or up-to-date. On a more latent view of clothing there is a hidden similarity between people. If you wear this you may present to do this or that, it’s all a concept of stereotypes.
A social conflict system of social inequalities “is based on class, gender and race.” A conflict of how much a pair of distressed jeans cost in one store from another can vary to a thick amount. You’ll find families with more money will have classier clothing and more mediocre families with basic, casual clothing. Clothing also varies from race to race, you’ll find for some male African Americans their clothes might be a lot baggier for both their jeans and shirt. Races bleed into others though, the color of someone’s skin doesn’t matter to the clothes on their back. It’s all about your attitude, what your tastes are or even what you’re exposed to. Women’s clothing dominates most retail stores, covering over thirty-five percent of clothing stores. You’ll find more women shopping for clothing then men without a doubt. Race shouldn’t interfere with the clothes that people choose to wear, although many were taught the opposite of this.
The symbolic interactions analysis at a micro-level explains that, society is ever-changing; people interact in infinite environments using multiple symbolic connections. People experience the clothing industry as ever-changing. One year something will be in style and then it’ll expire for possibly several years and then you’ll see it become popular again. Let’s use “converse” shoes as an example. How many teenagers parents used to wear this Brand of shoes back during their high school years? Or the fanny-pack, the convenient pouch that was buckled or strapped to your hip for easy access to your belongings, Most of society accepts this repetition; there is a shared reality in society.
In conclusion, Clothing plays a big part in our society on how we see what other people wear daily. Clothing industries are shooting through the ozone and they will keep producing for years to come, with fresher ideas or old ones reconstructed. People will never change and stereotypes will never change. No matter what race a person is it won’t matter what clothes they purchase or choose to personally wear.
Please can someone proofread this paper for me?
sorry but there is just too much too fix
just in the first paragraph focus on avoiding comma splices, excessive repetition of the same words, avoid overuse of rhetorical questions
if it is a formal essay, first person pronouns shouldn't be used (we), avoind using contractions
%26quot;the internet%26quot; is not a valid description for a source
Please can someone proofread this paper for me?
Bailey, we shouldn't be doing your homework for you.
I give it an A-. Im a real teacher and your essay was pretty good!
The center paragraph needs to be broken into several. Try logical breaks at %26quot;clothing creates a social solidarity' and 'A social conflict'
Interesting viewpoint.
